During development I encountered a caveat: Opus 4.5 can’t test or view a terminal output, especially one with unusual functional requirements. But despite being blind, it knew enough about the ratatui terminal framework to implement whatever UI changes I asked. There were a large number of UI bugs that likely were caused by Opus’s inability to create test cases, namely failures to account for scroll offsets resulting in incorrect click locations. As someone who spent 5 years as a black box Software QA Engineer who was unable to review the underlying code, this situation was my specialty. I put my QA skills to work by messing around with miditui, told Opus any errors with occasionally a screenshot, and it was able to fix them easily. I do not believe that these bugs are inherently due to LLM agents being better or worse than humans as humans are most definitely capable of making the same mistakes. Even though I myself am adept at finding the bugs and offering solutions, I don’t believe that I would inherently avoid causing similar bugs were I to code such an interactive app without AI assistance: QA brain is different from software engineering brain.
▲ 图片来自微博 @数码闲聊站，这一点在WPS官方版本下载中也有详细论述
<<interface，这一点在同城约会中也有详细论述
第五十五条 境外机构、组织、个人利用网络制造、传播虚假信息，损害中华人民共和国国家主权、安全、发展利益或者公共利益的，有关主管部门可以作出冻结财产、限制有关人员入境、限制在境内直接或者间接投资等决定。。safew官方版本下载是该领域的重要参考
Journals that focus on specific research questions could help to bridge the science–policy gap, if they can attract researchers.